We are going to conduct a very rigorous review for the articles submitted for the Conference. How we are going to conduct the review process is following:
At this first stage, the Conference Chairs will decide if article are suitable for the conference by asking questions such as:
Note: The Conference Chairs might reject the article immediately based on the above mentioned points, but otherwise it will move to the next stage, and into Double blind peer review.
The conference chairs will find and contact 2 to 3 other researchers or academics (technical committee members or form outside of the same) who are experts in the same field. They will be requested to review the article, and advise the conference chairs with their valuable comments.
So, what are the reviewers are looking for? This depends on the subject area, but they will be checking that your work is:
The authors will be given the feedback about their article, telling them if any changes need to be made before it can be published. Our authors tell us that the reviewers' comments can be extremely helpful, ensuring that the article is of a high quality. Please note the final editorial decision on a paper and the choice of who to invite to review is always at the conference chairs discretion.
The authors can amend their article based on the reviewers' comments and resubmitting it with changes made.
And that's it, authors made it through peer review. Next step is publication.
Every article submitted for publication in ICTSCI–2019 has been through peer review; its quality, validity, and relevance assessed by independent peers within the relevant field. We believe in the integrity of peer review.
First International Conference on Sustainable Technologies for Computational Intelligence